| |
| Author |
Message |
RonCrawford Site Admin

Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 1864 Location: Pottsville, PA (USA)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: Trying out some new bedding for the rodents |
|
Picked up a few bags of this stuff today, hopefully it works better than regular pine shavings. I'll let ya know!
If anyone has any prior use knowledge, please share it, thanks!

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
deborahbroadus Moderator

Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 6300 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
I don't know, Ron.
Pine is considered bad bedding for rats, and it's toxic for BPs..so what makes this different?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arlynos
Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 556 Location: whitney point, ny
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
I use pine bedding for all my animals except for my BP, and they seem to do fine with it. So long as you clean it regularly it should be just fine.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RonCrawford Site Admin

Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 1864 Location: Pottsville, PA (USA)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
| deborahbroadus wrote: | I don't know, Ron.
Pine is considered bad bedding for rats, and it's toxic for BPs..so what makes this different? | I'll look into this, thanks. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hhmoore
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
| deborahbroadus wrote: | | Pine is considered bad bedding for rats, and it's toxic for BPs..so what makes this different? |
I have mixed feelings on this - there are a couple of reasons that cedar and, to a lesser degree, pine have been labeld as "bad" or "toxic". I don't have time at the moment for a protracted explanation (and a google search should provide the information), but they are centered around phenols and aromatic oils. It has been said that the phenols contained in these woods are toxic to the liver, and the oils are irritating to the respiratory tract. (more recent studies seem to dispel much of the hype, and ammonia from waste is thought to be the biggest respiratory irritant)
I have personally used pine shavings, pine bark, and/or pine mulch on various reptiles for months-years with no apparent problems. The problem with the oils is fairly widely thought to be resolved with heat treating/drying...and a large percentage of the products available for pet use are kiln dried.
Regarding the product Ron is trying for the rats - it is kiln dried, highly absorbant, and said to bond with, and neutralize, ammonia. I've been thinking about using it myself, if I can find it locally. Let me know how you like it, Ron.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hhmoore
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
Oops - just noticed that the name of the product shown is slightly different than what I was looking at...but I suspect that they are essentially the same (how different can 100% pine pellets be??). My initial question was whether Ron's stuff was kiln dried, but since it is mold and bacteria resistant, I'm guessing it is.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deborahbroadus Moderator

Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 6300 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
| hhmoore wrote: | | Oops - just noticed that the name of the product shown is slightly different than what I was looking at...but I suspect that they are essentially the same (how different can 100% pine pellets be??). My initial question was whether Ron's stuff was kiln dried, but since it is mold and bacteria resistant, I'm guessing it is. |
Ok..everyone can research Pine and the affects on Rats, etc for themselves and make a decision. It's a shame that there's such a mismash of information out there..but it comes with the Internet territory; any fool can post information and sound like an expert. So, I would suggest checking only those articles that are actually research topics. Perhaps Harald can suggest a few links? (when you have time, of course.)
I have another area of concern (one thing at a time ..it keeps the posts shorter). I have used pellets (naturally, not Pine) While it did reduce odors, the ratterlings had a tendency to be suffocated as the bedding got softer and the bigger rats stepped on them. and mashed them into the substrate (this has been my experience). The bedding doesn't stay in there long enough to get moldy..so I haven't experienced that yet. I did also try a Newspaper pelleted substrate and it didn't control odors as well as it promised.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hhmoore
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
I'm not discounting all the warnings, Deb...just saying that I have mixed feelings about them. I personally don't like pine shavings, and haven't used them in many years (I did use them for some time, way back when)...but I suspect that there is a significant difference between shavings and the bark or mulch products I have used regularly. I prefer shredded aspen as it is much finer/softer, and I prefer cypress because it is coarser & I like the look (I sometimes mix pine & cypress mulch)
As far as the links - remind me in a few days, if necessary, lol. I did a quick search, and there were several good explanations right on the first page. No reason anybody that is interested can't do the same.
And you're right, it will be easy to find statements for both sides of the issue...it's all a matter of which ones people choose to believe/reference. I'll say that one should try to consider the age of the information, the subjects, and the qualifications of the author(s).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hhmoore
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
| deborahbroadus wrote: | I have another area of concern (one thing at a time ..it keeps the posts shorter). I have used pellets (naturally, not Pine) While it did reduce odors, the ratterlings had a tendency to be suffocated as the bedding got softer and the bigger rats stepped on them. and mashed them into the substrate. |
now that could be a problem...thanks for the heads up.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hhmoore
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
One other thing - there may well be "rat specific" issues that I didn't bother to look at before, as the whole grow your own game is new to me (I did it VERY briefly, back around 1991 or so, and never even considered it again until recently)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hhmoore
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
Hey, Ron.
Just wondering what you thought of the stuff (and if your findings matched Deb's, and/or mine)
I didn't end up with that brand, but I'm sure the two are pretty similar. Mine came in a 30 lb bag, and I didn't quite get through all my rodent cages (thankfully, I don't keep a whole lot of them...and half of them are growers). I put a small layer of the pellets in, then put a little coarse aspen on one side for bedding. After two weeks, there really wasn't any significant odor buildup, and it was basically pretty dry...unlike the cages I didn't use it in, which I had already had to change because there was no effective absorbancy & it was starting to smell.
Cleanup was a breeze. Shake the bins a couple of times and dump. The inside of the bins was pretty consistently clean and dry. On the few that did have some bedding stick, a quick wipe with some clean aspen saw it cascading into the garbage bag (again, dry...a pleasant finding).
So positive scores for odor and waste absorption, as well as cleanup.
On the negative side, the stuff I was dragging out of there was HEAVY. I mean, it stands to reason that it would be, as I started out with 30 lbs, + a small amount of aspen, then adding chewed up food powder (damned ASFs!) and absorbed waste, but I didn't even dump the contents of all the cages into that first bag & I thought it was going to tear. (I'd say I did about 2/3 the boxes, before I lifted the bag & decided not to put any more in.)
Also, I use primarily made for the purpose lab boxes, with the angled food bins...and I noticed that it had increased in volume enough that they had burrowed a tunnel to let them pass under that low spot in a few of the cages.
Negative scores for weight, and maybe one for risk due to expansion (could contaminate feed or cause water issues)
I didn't use it tonite, so I'll see what I think the next time I clean. I'm thinking that for 3 seasons (when I can take much of the stuff down back into the woods), I might run with it. It was worth the $4 for the decreased clean up effort (and the extra week between cleanings). If I can find the bigger bags at the other supply place, I'll grab them and give them a whirl.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Buck_99 Moderator

Joined: 03 Nov 2006 Posts: 1243 Location: Midlothian, VA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
| hhmoore wrote: | | then adding chewed up food powder (damned ASFs!) |
That's the truth! What is it with these guys and the way they handle their food?
I'm following this thread with great interest, and I'm looking forward to hearing Ron's thoughts too. I've been using aspen, but if I could safely switch to some form of pine I would.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RonCrawford Site Admin

Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 1864 Location: Pottsville, PA (USA)
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
You don't need a lot of this stuff in the cage at all. This I found out the hard way. It's way too easy to add too much of this stuff because the pellets are really small and this might deceive you into thinking that you have to fill up the bottom of the cage and then some - like you do with regular bedding. Nada, not true at all - far from the truth actually.
You only need just a small scoop that barely covers the floor of the cage, oftentimes leaving large bare areas of the cage floor surface exposed. It reminds me of those tiny gel type toys for kids that expand exponentially when you leave it in a bowl of water to soak over night. The pellets break down and expand as well into a material that's very similar to saw dust.
Deb made a good point about the mortality of babies. I've seen a few cages where some of the babies expired but that's to be expected sometimes, even with regular bedding. It's possible that the pellet substrate could be breathed in by babies and expand in their lungs, thus causing suffocation. I can't say for certain one way or the other right now because we've harvested many litters since trying the pellet bedding.
The packaging claims that it's "dust free". This is true "on the way in" but most certainly not the case "on the way out". It looks like saw dust and as hhmoore noted, is quite dense. I haven't noticed any difference in odor with this stuff compared to regular bedding and I'm not prepared to recommend it one way or another right now. I'll have more of an opinion over the course of a few more weeks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hhmoore
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 301
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
Yeah - I figured I was putting in more than I needed, and will use less next time (the 30# bag will cover all my cages that way, too)...but I used a pretty shallow layer & it definitely looked like it needed more. I'll probably experiment a bit next time around - go for a fully covered floor with some of the cages, and a more sparse layer in some others. I think I'll continue to add a bit of aspen for bedding.
Thanks for your input, Ron.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|